A look into Blockchain, Bitcoin and Etherium
Analysis of Bitcoin and Ethereum
In 2009, bitcoin was created by
an unknown person or a group called Santosh Nakamoto [1] . In his whitepaper, he
proposed an algorithmic self-policing system that could maintain a value in a
ledger through cross checking of its credibility by multiple nodes on the
network. This system would be de-centralized working on the internet on the
concept of peer to peer public key cryptography also used by BitTorrent [1] . The computing power
required to maintain the system comes from miners, which are granted bitcoins
as part of reward as they put/process a new block in the ledger [2] . These miners are
also granted transaction fees for every evaluation of a transaction. This makes
the system sustainable with enough attraction for profit to maintain [2] .
The Blockchain comprise of all
the addresses and balances of the coin available on the network and every node
on the network has a copy of the Blockchain that help authenticates value
accuracy and denies alien inputs. These qualities allow it to be a viable
solution towards decentralization and is being crowned as the Fifth disruptive
computing paradigm after Mainframe, PC, Internet and Social-Mobile [1] . Bitcoin is what set
this ball rolling. The founder of bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto whose identity is still
a mystery, published a whitepaper on the 31st of October 2008. This
extremely famous whitepaper proposed advent of this online currency.
After
Satoshi kickstarted the bitcoin Blockchain, the debate about decentralized
online currency started in full swing, and not long after, people started
talking about how the Blockchain can be used for applications which are more
than just money. In 2014, Buterin first proposed a project known as Ethereum
which aims to develop an application-based system which is to be used over this
de-centralized system and provide the end-developer with the language to build
software over the Blockchain [3] . The purpose of this
application is that it facilitates trust between two parties, that would
otherwise not be present due to various reasons such as geographical
separation, unwillingness or incompetence. Ether, the cryptocurrency of
Ethereum, is also traded as other crypto-currencies used to monetize work and
run applications. According to [4] ,
it has the capacity to be used to secure, codify and decentralize almost any
asset online. Microsoft’s partnership with ConsenSys is already offering an
Ethereum based Blockchain service (EBaaS) on the Microsoft Azure system for
developers and enterprises to have access to a cloud-based application
development environment [5] .
The same
scalability issues faced by bitcoin is also faced by Ethereum i.e., every
transaction on the Blockchain needs to be verified by each node but in
Ethereum’s case, the nodes on the network only store states rather than the
entire block chain history as in the case of bitcoin. Previously, we discussed
that the size of the Blockchain, which is constantly increasing, decreases the ability
of a regular user to become a node. This played out to be a massive problem for
bitcoin and can become an even severer problem for Ethereum since its growth is
faster than bitcoin. The two coins hold purposeful social progressions. This
smart contract allows mutual trust between two parties despite of other social
factors i.e., location, country, different monetary body or other differences thus
regardless of these weaknesses, is a huge advancement in the world of
technology and sociology.
As a
concluding note, we realize the importance of Blockchain and cryptocurrencies
as a game changer in the internet domain. Its de-centralized usage, security
and open-source-ness gave rise to a new frontier which demands fairness over
use of data online. The two exampled currencies hold the potential to
revolutionize how we carry out our online transactions and use networked
applications. This solution, with its scalability issues, still offers a major
leap in peer to peer, open online ledgers.
References
[1]
|
M. Swan, Blockchain:
Blueprint for new economy, Sebastopol: O'reilly, 2015.
|
[2]
|
S. Nakamoto,
“Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer electronic cash system,” 31 10 2008. [Online].
Available: http://nakamotoinstitute.org/bitcoin/.
|
[3]
|
G. Wood, “Etherium:
A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger,” 12 04 2017.
[Online]. Available:
http://www.cryptopapers.net/papers/ethereum-yellowpaper.pdf.
|
[4]
|
V. Buterin,
“Etherium whitepaper, A next generation smart contract & decentralized
application platform,” 2014. [Online]. Available:
https://www.weusecoins.com/assets/pdf/library/Ethereum_white_paper-a_next_generation_smart_contract_and_decentralized_application_platform-vitalik-buterin.pdf.
|
[5]
|
P. Bajpai, “Bitcoin
Vs Ethereum: Driven by different purposes,” 02 2018. [Online]. Available:
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/031416/bitcoin-vs-ethereum-driven-different-purposes.asp.
|
Comments
Post a Comment